
01:52
Good morning everyone

02:13
Good morning!

02:16
Good morning

02:45
Good morning - welcome, we're delighted to you can join us.

02:46
Good morning everyone!

02:53
Good morning, everybody! Greetings from sunny Manchester! :)

03:09
Good morning from Glasgow!

03:19
morning all :)

03:25
Morning! Nice to see you all

03:30
Good morning :)

03:35
Good morning!

03:47
Good morning!

04:09
Good evening from Melbourne!

04:13
France!

04:14
Sunny London!

04:20
Edinburgh :D

04:27
Exeter :)

04:29
Leeds:)

04:31
Cloudy Coventry

04:31
Algeria

04:32
Hull

04:34
Hello from Cambridge!

04:41
Aberystwyth :)

04:47
Rimini, Italy :)

04:50
Good morning from the Dales!

04:51
The sunny Hintertaunus - so not too far off Goethe Universität :D

04:55
Hello from UCL in Portugal :)

04:57
Italy!

05:02
Aarhus, Denmark :)

05:13
Hi all, from Newcastle upon Tyne!

06:01
Dialling in from the reading room of the German Literature Archive in Marbach, so silence reigns, but it’s good to be with you all!

07:37
Hello from Warsaw.

07:59
Good morning Peter (Sowden)! Nice to see you here :) Greetings all from overcast Derbyshire.

08:30
Good morning everyone

12:05
Hello from Birmingham University

23:03
We will have an open Q&A session after the chairs have asked questions to our speakers.

43:28
Tips for revising your thesis to book (Peter Lang): https://peterlangoxford.wordpress.com/2020/10/29/revising-your-phd-thesis-into-a-book-academic-publishing/

43:47
Many thanks, Laurel!

49:51
Thank you, Hilary, you asked my question :)

54:07
If you have arrived to this session after we started, we will have an open Q&A session after the chairs have asked questions to our speakers. Feel free to write questions here and we will try to cover as many as possible.

55:24
Thanks Liam, I would like to ask, when submitting the proposal, do editors prefer a revised sample chapter or just the whole manuscript of the thesis?

55:40
I would add about OA publishing that increasingly grant providers are mandating that outputs are produced in this format - which is how I ended up publishing my own monograph in OA (stipulated by the ERC)

57:30
1. My research is interdisciplinary (literature and law). My supervisors and funders are very supportive of this, but academic structures still seem pretty compartmentalised. How open to interdisciplinary work would you say publishing is? 2. Several speakers have mentioned journal articles as an alternative to a book. What of edited volumes?

58:19
Thank you Laurel for speaking about time - I had a question if the author needs an extension on what they had envision in the proposal. Is that frown upon?

01:00:42
I am thinking of using my handouts from teaching as a basis to write a text book which my students can then use as the text book for my module. However, my content is mostly time-sensitive so if it may take up to 18 months/2 years to publish a book most of my content would probably be out-of-date. Would this be a case of trying to publish an e-book? Can e-books be published more quickly?

01:02:44
Thank you so much for this informative session from a lurking musicologist (with broader interests in cultural history and French Studies too)! I have a quick question which builds a bit on Mavis’s question: I gather that for ECRs it’s expected that more of the book should be “done” at the time when you’re approaching a publisher. Is this the case, and if so, how much would be the ideal amount?

01:03:29
Do you have any tips on how to see your thesis from a new perspective when rewriting it for publication? It is often quite difficult to read your thesis as the 'reader' and not from the author's point of view

01:07:33
As to comparative literature, which press is more suitable for publishing? Thank you.

01:13:00
Thank you to all panellists, including for the caution re edited volumes.

01:17:41
If we publish a thesis chapter into journal article, will this be considered a self plagiarism?

01:20:16
Any advice on negotiating the issue of PhD funders requiring theses to be made freely available online within 12 months of submission when proposing a monograph based on a thesis (albeit transformed)?

01:22:30
If a manuscript receives positive peer reviews and all reviewers recommend publication, is there still a possibility of rejection? Thank you.

01:29:59
Login for the next session: Meeting ID: 920 1997 4553 Passcode: 146453

01:30:34
Thank you very much for this session and to all panellists

01:30:35
Thank you for a really helpful session!

01:30:35
Thank you

01:30:43
Brilliant panel - thank you so much! So helpful :)

01:30:44
Thank you so much for this informative session!

01:30:45
Thank you! Really helpful!

01:30:46
thank you so much to the panelists, this was so useful!

01:30:48
Thank you very much to all the speakers!

01:30:48
Sorry I thought the next session starts in 15 minutes?

01:30:48
Thank you very much

01:30:49
Thank you, it was very useful!

01:30:51
Thanks!!

01:30:51
thank you for this brilliant panel

01:30:52
Many thanks!

01:30:55
Thank you very much! Very useful!

01:30:55
Thank you so much!

01:30:55
Thank you!

01:30:55
Thank you!

01:30:58
Many thanks for such an insightful session!

01:30:59
Thank you!!

01:30:59
Thank you!

01:31:01
Thank you so much - this was very useful

01:31:03
Thank you.

01:31:06
Thank you everyone for a very useful session!

01:31:10
Meeting ID: 920 1997 4553 Passcode: 146453

01:31:12
Thank you!

01:31:14
Thank you!